The PET, the C64 in the 25 Most Important PCs

Started by RobertB, February 12, 2011, 04:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RobertB


     MaximumPC has listed their choices for the "25 Most Important PCs in History".  The Commodore PET is at #10, and the Commodore 64 is at #19.  To see the gallery of the 25 computers, go to

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/25_most_important_pcs_history#slide-0-field_gallery_images-17104

          FCUG celebrating 30 years,
          Robert Bernardo
          Fresno Commodore User Group
          http://videocam.net.au/fcug
          The Other Group of Amigoids
          http://www.calweb.com/~rabel1/
          Southern California Commodore & Amiga Network
          http://www.sccaners.org

airship

Serving up content-free posts on the Interwebs since 1983.
History of INFO Magazine

RobertB

Quote from: airship on February 13, 2011, 04:36 AM...KIM-I at #6.
Well, I didn't say anything about that, because it is MOS Technologies and not really Commodore.  However, Peter Jennings, who did the KIM-1, also did Chessmate for Commodore.  Cousins once removed?  :)

          Writing from sunny L.A. with 80 deg. temps.,
          Robert Bernardo
          Fresno Commodore User Group
          http://videocam.net.au/fcug
          The Other Group of Amigoids
          http://www.calweb.com/~rabel1/
          Southern California Commodore & Amiga Network
          http://www.sccaners.org

BigDumbDinosaur

Quote from: RobertB on February 12, 2011, 04:35 PM

     MaximumPC has listed their choices for the "25 Most Important PCs in History".  The Commodore PET is at #10, and the Commodore 64 is at #19.  To see the gallery of the 25 computers, go to

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/25_most_important_pcs_history#slide-0-field_gallery_images-17104

          FCUG celebrating 30 years,
          Robert Bernardo
          Fresno Commodore User Group
          http://videocam.net.au/fcug
          The Other Group of Amigoids
          http://www.calweb.com/~rabel1/
          Southern California Commodore & Amiga Network
          http://www.sccaners.org
The put the Trash-80 at number 11.  I don't agree with that at all.  In fact, there was little about the Trash-80 that was important, other than being sold in stores where the hired help didn't know their katushkas from a hole in the ground.  Ditto for the IBM-PC, which was a "remarkable" piece of junky engineering.

The C-64 should have been much higher on the totem pole.  It made "home computer" a household phrase.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't need no stinking x86!

Blacklord

I don't get the feeling that they are numbered "in order of importance" actually.